The role that photographs play in fixing people in our minds eye is vital for a family historian. Photographs of forebears are pored over, with each feature compared to those in other photos, to other family members, and to yourself – seeking recognition, belonging, a likeness – and memory, for those recently departed. How often were these photographs clasped close and studied by family shortly after they were taken, as they were, unexpectedly, the last of loved ones?
I have written about my great, great-grandmother, Rachel Lawn née Hart as if I knew her, but of course I was born long after she died – even my own grandmother was too little to remember her as she was under two when Rachel died. All I know of what Rachel was like is from a handful of six or seven photographs that I had been given copies of from across the family, mostly formal family groups and a few stories second and third-hand. Trying to select images for the book, and the requirements of publishing means that a lot of details (and colour and tone) are lost, so when new photos turn up, it is exciting to share them in this medium.
It is now just over a hundred years since Rachel Lawn, née Hart died, aged 57, less than a year after her son Ben was killed in WWI. I now have been given access to several more photographs¹ – most tiny ( 5cm x 3cm ) reprints off scratched negatives and in poor condition. I have edited the images to enhance and repair obvious cracks and stains. These ‘new’ images add a further dimension to what little we know of Rachel – but more importantly these images that were taken in a the space of a year: just before Ben was killed, and just after, and trace the grief that family said broke her heart and sent her to an early grave.
This studio image (which appeared in my book) was taken in Reefton on Ben’s final leave before embarkation and brought together almost all of the Lawn family (except Charlie and George). Along with this original image I also had various group poses: Dinah, Ben and Jim; Ben and John; James and his sons. I was startled to find that there was another portrait – Rachel with her two daughters Eva and Dinah. It seemed that ‘just the women’ were not as valued as the pictures of the ‘boys’ in uniform which several different family members had copies of.
In this portrait of mother and daughters it appears that Dinah is wearing one of Ben’s collar badges (with ‘XIII’ in the centre) at the throat of her blouse, and Rachel too is possibly wearing one of John’s cap badges, it is unclear in both photos whether the flowers on Eva’s blouse are also pinned by a badge.
Previously I had only seen one informal photograph of Rachel – this somewhat blurry snapshot taken about 1910 in Blacks Point:
Now another small image taken in summer time – of Rachel and James Lawn with a young woman has come to hand – I am not positive, but judging by the shape of her jaw, this may be Eva Evans née Lawn; I would be interested to hear what others think. How lovely to see Rachel in a relaxed and happy mood, James dapper in his car coat: a vingette of before.
The next image I had used in my book was what I thought of as ‘Rachel’s last photo’. In To Live a Long and Prosperous Life, I wrote that this was taken on a visit to see her new grandson. James and Rachel had travelled to Woodville in the North Island for an extended stay² with George and Doll and their children, the little boy ‘named after his late uncle’ Benjamin. Rachel here is smiling, but looked tired. Her dress, as usual, is dark, but the dull crepe and the complete lack of lace at her throat and her hair pulled back a little more severely suggests that she was wearing mourning clothes: it is likely that the visit was arranged to help Rachel in her deep grief.
Another photograph – a portrait of Rachel – had been taken around this time (her bow brooch doesnt have the chain in the photo above so possibly not the same day). Is it my imagination, or does she look resigned – a sadness in her eyes? Perhaps just a result of the poor photographic print, her colour looks high. Blood pressure elevated, overweight, suffering from grief and depression, a few weeks after this on their journey home Rachel was overwhelmed by a stroke which killed her.
Another candid shot – possibly as James and Rachel were about to depart on their homeward journey:
Rachel fell ill on the overnight Wellington to Lyttelton ferry and upon berthing she was taken to Lyttelton hospital where she lingered for three days before she died. Family, including her mother Dinah Hansen raced from the Coast to be by her side and others came from afar for her funeral and burial at Lyttelton cemetery.
George and his family must have travelled down for her funeral and then visited the Coast, because the next snapshot is of James with his grandchildren, possibly at the Evans farm at Waitahu, near Reefton. He holds baby Ben on his lap, on his right is Edith Evans and on his left Jean Lawn. Sitting on two little chairs are George’s daughters Olive and Evelyn Lawn and on the grass at the front are Harry Evans and the only possibility for the curly-haired toddler in the centre is my Nana, Eva Evans (born December 1915).
The final snap was one that appeared in my book, but I have included here again as it is easier to see (somewhat blurry) detail in this format. I believe that this is taken at George Lawn’s home in Christchurch, where he and his family shifted in the early 1920s. James went to live with them there at Slater Street, Richmond until he died in 1928, and was buried with Rachel in Lyttelton. George’s daughter Olive was living there in the 1960s when I visited and stayed there as a child.
Peering at these new images, it brings home to me that we take for granted the ability we have today of taking endless digital images of our family, our homes and ourselves, yet we rarely think how they might be available for the future generations. Do you print out photographs? Do you edit or delete images that show the everyday interiors or awkward moments? The last photograph here is tantalising – if only it was a clear image and we could see more of what is in the background: what is in the picture frame above the fireplace? I have so many questions about the things in this photograph! Where did the shell come from? What are the porcelain animals? What time was it on the clock?
What matters is that someone thought to keep these pictures, and I hope that somewhere in your family pictures are safely stored (and named and dated!) for the future generations: to remember, lest we forget.
¹ Thanks to Mervyn Lawn for sharing these images.
² Little Benjamin was born 19 October 1916 just four days after the family learned of Ben’s death. In the group picture little Benjamin looks about six months old, and the photo taken after Rachel’s death he would have been 10 months, so if the George Lawn family picture was taken in Woodville James and Rachel were visiting there for several months.